ABSTRACT
In the public procurement system in Nigeria has over the years been abused leading to cost inflation, delay in project delivery, poor quality of work, and project abandonment. The aim of this study is to examine the impact of the due process policy on construction projects delivery in Nigeria. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire distributed to 52 random selections of constructing, consulting and public organizations operating in Lagos Nigeria. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. The result shows that due process policy has a very positive impact in Niger’s procurement terrain. Adherence to due process proceedings had highest impact on cost savings, prequalification of contractors and detailed project design, quality of project delivery, and project duration. The study serve as a feedback to the construction stakeholders in Nigeria and contains useable information for optimizing the existing due process mechanism to enhance not only probity, accountability, transparency and competition in public contract awards, but also the policy’s resultant effects on quality of executed projects, delivery-on-budget and time considerations.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title page
Approval ……………………………………………………………………………i
Dedication …………………………………………………………..……………iii
Acknowledgment …………………………………………………………………iv
Abstract ……………………………………………………………………………v
Table of contents …………………………………………………………………vi
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 Introduction …………………………………………………………………1
1.1 Background to the study …………………………………………………….1
1.2 Statement of problem ………………………………………………….……3
1.3 Research question
1.4 Purpose of study …………………………………………………………….4
1.5 Significance of the study ……………………………………………………5
1.6 Scope of the study …………………………………………………..………6
1.7 Definition of terms …………………………………………………………6
CHAPTER TWO
2.0 Review of Related Literature ………………………………………………8
2.1 The concept of cash flow
CHAPTER THREE
3.0 Research methodology
3.1 Research design
3.2 Description of population
3.3 Method of data collection
3.4 Sample size
3.5 instrument for Data collection
3.6 Validation of the instrument
3.7 Distribution and Retrieva
3.8 Method of Data analysis
CHAPTER FOUR
Presentation of data and Analysis
CHAPTER 5
5.0 Discussion of findings, conclusion and
5.1 Summary of findings
5.2 Conclusion
5.3 Recommendation
5.4 Limitation of the study
5.5 Suggestion for further research
References
Appendix
Questionnaire
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
BRIEF HISTORY OF THE STUDY
Project success is basically to gain the research on public procurement act in the execution project Shash(1993) explains that a construction company can either negotiate with the client or use a competitive tendering process to obtain a contract. F.U. and Drew (2002) suggest that competitive tendering is the most common method use for contractor selection.
In competitive tendering process, a client selects a numbers of constructor to tender or not tender. The contractor need to submit an estimated cost to execute the project at hand, if they intend to tender. The client would select the contractor who submitted the best cost for executing the project (Shash 1993, P. 111). Therefore the decision to tender is the first step that contractors need to consider. The are various factors that need to be considered by the contractor in order to make a decision to tender. The decision is highly related to the specific project and macro environment. It is hard to make a decision in a limited time by the management team. The decision generally is made on the basic experience, intuition and guesses. (Egemen and Mohamed 2007, therefore are many researchers that have discovered the factors that affect the tender / no tender process unfortunately, there has not been any similar research project global economic recession, construction related activities are decreased significantly.
Terms of Use: This is an academic paper. Students should NOT copy our materials word to word, as we DO NOT encourage Plagiarism. Only use as a guide in developing your original research work. Thanks.
Disclaimer: All undertaking works, records, and reports posted on this website, eprojectguide.com are the property/copyright of their individual proprietors. They are for research reference/direction purposes and the works are publicly supported. Do not present another person’s work as your own to maintain a strategic distance from counterfeiting its results. Use it as a guide and not duplicate the work in exactly the same words (verbatim). eprojectguide.com is a vault of exploration works simply like academia.edu, researchgate.net, scribd.com, docsity.com, course hero, and numerous different stages where clients transfer works. The paid membership on eprojectguide.com is a method by which the site is kept up to help Open Education. In the event that you see your work posted here, and you need it to be eliminated/credited, it would be ideal if you call us on +2348064699975 or send us a mail along with the web address linked to the work, to eprojectguide@gmail.com. We will answer to and honor each solicitation. Kindly note notification it might take up to 24 – 48 hours to handle your solicitation.