COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ANTIMICROBIAL STRENGTH OF THREE MOST COMMON ANTIBIOTICS USED IN ENUGU (CASE STUDY OF ANTIBIOTICS DRUGS BROUGHT IN OBIAGU.)
In comparing the antimicrobial strength of three most common antibiotics, which includes: streptomycin chloranphenicol and gentarccin.
Samples of urine and high vaginal swab (H.V.S) were collected from park lane Enugu. The organisms isolated were pure culture of staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli
Sensitivity test was carried out with the use of sensitivity disk containing various minimum inhibitory concentration of the different antibiotics.
The result obtained shaved that gentamicn was more effective followed by chloramphenicol while some organisms shaved resistant to streptomycin.
TABLE 1 NUTRIENT AGAR
TABLE 2 BLOOD AGAR
TABLE 3: ANTIBIOTICS AGAINST SYAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS
TABLE 4: ANTIBIOTIC AGAINST ESCHERICHIA COLI
FIGURE 1: STREPTOMYCIN
FIGURE 2: CHLORAMPHENICOL
FIGURE3: SENSITIVITY TEST ON STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS
FIGURE 4 SENSITIVITY TEST ON ESCHERICHIA COLI
FIGURE 5: STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS AGAINST ANTIBIOTICS
FIGURE 6: ESCHERICHIA COLI AGAINST ANTIBIOTICS
Title page
Certification
Dedication
Acknowledgement
Abstract
List of tables
List of figures
Table of contents
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Historical background
1.2 Aims and objective
1.3 Hypothesis
1.4 Statement of problem
1.5 Scope of study
1.6 Limitation of study
2.0 Literature review
3.1 Procurement of antibiotics
3.1.1 streptomycin
2.1.2 Chloramphenicol
2.1.3 Gentamicin
2.2 Antimicrobial activity in vitro
2.3 Antimicrobial activity in vivo
2.4 Resistance to antimicrobial drugs
2.5 Factors affecting antimicrobial activity
2.6 Clinical use of antibiotics
2.7 Characteristic of antibiotics
3.0 Materials and method
3.1 Sample collection
3.1.1 Media composition
3.1.2 Direction for the preparation of nutrient agar
3.1.3 Direction for the preparation of blood agar
3.1.4 Material used for the prewritten of media
4.0 Isolation and identification procedures
4.1.1 Isolation and identification of staphylococcus aureus
4.1.2 Isolation and identification of escherichia coli
4.2 Sensitivity test
5.0 RECOMMENDATION
5.1 CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 HISTORICAL BACK GROUND
Antibiotics are chemicals when the chemical are put into the body, they stop the growth of kinds of germs. They help the body to fight diseases. More than 3,000 years ago ancient people stumbled over the discovery that some moulds could be used as a cure. The egyptians, the chinese, and indians of central American would use mold to treat rashes and infected would. At that time they didn’t understand either diseases or treatment. As time went on, people began to gain some insight of disease. In the 1860 Louis Pasteur Shaw that many disease were caused it bacteria. Later he discovered that we may be able to fight germ and other microbes. It was two German doctors, who were first to make an effective medication form microbes. Kudo if and Emmerich and Oscar has conducted their experiment in the 1890. They proved that germ that would for another. All the men did was to take the germ from infected bandages and grow then in a test tube. They would then isolate a particular germ that caused green in factions in open would. This germs was bacteria called Bacillus pyoicyaneus. They put then into another test tube containing other type of bacteria, it was then it happened that the bacillus pyocyaneus wiped out the other disease germ. The germs that was killed were those that
PAGES 36
PRICE 3000
Terms of Use: This is an academic paper. Students should NOT copy our materials word to word, as we DO NOT encourage Plagiarism. Only use as a guide in developing your original research work. Thanks.
Disclaimer: All undertaking works, records, and reports posted on this website, eprojectguide.com are the property/copyright of their individual proprietors. They are for research reference/direction purposes and the works are publicly supported. Do not present another person’s work as your own to maintain a strategic distance from counterfeiting its results. Use it as a guide and not duplicate the work in exactly the same words (verbatim). eprojectguide.com is a vault of exploration works simply like academia.edu, researchgate.net, scribd.com, docsity.com, course hero, and numerous different stages where clients transfer works. The paid membership on eprojectguide.com is a method by which the site is kept up to help Open Education. In the event that you see your work posted here, and you need it to be eliminated/credited, it would be ideal if you call us on +2348064699975 or send us a mail along with the web address linked to the work, to eprojectguide@gmail.com. We will answer to and honor each solicitation. Kindly note notification it might take up to 24 – 48 hours to handle your solicitation.