Since the introduction of the Apple IIe computer in the early 1980s, the term ” technology ” has represented a broad range of interests and has been the subject of numerous interpretations. In school systems nationwide , technology has been the focus of curriculum renewal projects and school funding debates. It has been the rallying cry for leading many school districts into the 21st century.
Our fascination with technology stems, in large degree, from its ambiguity within existing paradigms. Does technology represent things, like computers, modems, pencils, microscopes, and televisions; words or ideas, like ” progress ” and ” change ” ; processes, like animal breeding and voting ; or delivery systems, like expert systems and novice systems? Each perspective on technology has its unique attributes and leads the individual to different conclusions and implementation strategies.
Attempts in the early 1980s to bring technology into education involved the creation of computer literacy classes at the elementary and secondary levels. From region to region, these courses were quite similar in their offerings—they taught students about the parts of the computer, keyboarding fundamentals, word processing, drill-and-practice applications , and introductory programming.
Even with the exponential advances in electronic technology, their legacy can still be found today in the guise of integrated learning systems and central word processing and remediation labs. As one observes the current uses of computer technology nationwide, a few distinct patterns emerge. • Staff development opportunities for teachers to explore the potential of computer technology are oftentimes insufficient and misdirected. • Most computer technology is used for isolated activities unrelated to a central instructional theme, concept, or topic. •
The use of the computer is often one step removed from the classroom teacher. • Technology is used to sustain the existing curricula rather than serve as a catalyst for change. • The majority of district or site technology plans do not establish a significant link between the need for technology and identifiable instructional priorities (e.g., emphasizing higher order thinking skills or restructuring the science and mathematics curriculum).
Instead, they emphasize a need to meet a vaguely defined computer/student ratio or establish districtwide local area networks. At best, the role of technology has complemented the conventional instructional curriculum and its corresponding emphasis on expository teaching, traditional verbal activities, sequential instructional materials, and evaluation practices characterized by multiple-choice, short-answer, and true-or-false responses. When planning staff development targeting classroom integration of technology
Terms of Use: This is an academic paper. Students should NOT copy our materials word to word, as we DO NOT encourage Plagiarism. Only use as a guide in developing your original research work. Thanks.
Disclaimer: All undertaking works, records, and reports posted on this website, eprojectguide.com are the property/copyright of their individual proprietors. They are for research reference/direction purposes and the works are publicly supported. Do not present another person’s work as your own to maintain a strategic distance from counterfeiting its results. Use it as a guide and not duplicate the work in exactly the same words (verbatim). eprojectguide.com is a vault of exploration works simply like academia.edu, researchgate.net, scribd.com, docsity.com, course hero, and numerous different stages where clients transfer works. The paid membership on eprojectguide.com is a method by which the site is kept up to help Open Education. In the event that you see your work posted here, and you need it to be eliminated/credited, it would be ideal if you call us on +2348064699975 or send us a mail along with the web address linked to the work, to eprojectguide@gmail.com. We will answer to and honor each solicitation. Kindly note notification it might take up to 24 – 48 hours to handle your solicitation.