Abstract
This project dealt on the problems of policy implementation in Nigeria public sector ( A case study of National Poverty Eradication programme (NAPEP) in chapter ones are discussed in details the background of the study, statement of the problem, objective of the study, significance of the study and research question. Chapter two the researcher dealth with the literature review under which in one way or the other gave useful suggestion to the stated research problem. Chapter three used in this study, research design method of data collection , sample size, sampling techniques. In chapter four treated presentation and of data under which only question relating to the research question were used in the study and calculation was based on the responses from the questionnaire distributed. Finally in chapter five, the researcher made her summary and recommendations to the establishments of the topic the problem of policy implementation in Nigeria public sector ( A case study of national poverty eradication programme Imo state)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title page i
Approval page ii
Dedication iii
Acknowledgement iv
Abstract v
Table of contents vi
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 Introduction 1
CHAPTER TWO
democratic government in Nigeria 17
Poverty eradication programme in Nigeria 32
NAPEP interventions in poverty alleviation 33
Findings of national poverty Eradication programme/achievements 35
References 38
CHAPTER THREE
3.0 Research methodology 39
3.1 Introduction 39
3.2 Research Design 40
3.3 Methods of data collections 40
3.4 Population and Sample size 41
3.5 Sampling techniques 42
3.6 Data Analysis techniques 44
CHAPTER FOUR
4.0 Data presentation 45
4.1 Data Analysis 46
4.2 Research findings 52
CHAPTER FIVE
5.0 Summary, conclusion and Recommendation 54
5.1 Summary 54
5.2 Conclusion 55
5.3 Recommendation 57
Bibliography 60
Appendix 62
Questionnaire. 63
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROND OF THE STUDY
Stripped of all technicalities, implementation problem in most developing nations is the problem of a reddening gap between intentions and results. Honadle (1991) tried to identify the problem associated with policy implementation as that of social carpenters and masons who fail to build to specifications and thus distort the blueprint. He was equating policy with building plan. Quoting him he said. “Implication is the nemesis of designers, it conjures up images of plans gone every end of social carpenters and masons who fail to build to specifications and thereby distort the beautiful blue prints for progress which were handed to them”.
The above quotations show the importance that is attached to policy implementation and those that are responsible for implementing these policies. It is shown that no matter how beautiful the blue print of a programme is, a defective implementation of it will make nonsense of the whole programme.
Unfortunately, the situation as described by Honadle above is what goes on in Nigeria. As stated by Eyonmuan (1971) implementation in these country often turns out to be the graveyard of policy where the intentions of the designer of policies are often undermined by a constellation in cooperation with people little attention is paid to the subject of policy implementation by policy decision makers while it is often taken for granted that once a policy is adopted by government it must be implemented and the desired goals achieved. There is policy failure when there is a sizeable gap between a policy decision and its implementation. Such a gap is characterized. For example, by the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer in spite of the stated policy goal to the contrary.
Despite the plethora of poverty alleviation programme which past government had initiated and implemented, by 1999 when the Obasanjo administration came to power a world Banks report indicated that Nigeria’s Human Development index (HDI) was only 0416 and that about 70 percent of the population was vegetating below the brand line.
Terms of Use: This is an academic paper. Students should NOT copy our materials word to word, as we DO NOT encourage Plagiarism. Only use as a guide in developing your original research work. Thanks.
Disclaimer: All undertaking works, records, and reports posted on this website, eprojectguide.com are the property/copyright of their individual proprietors. They are for research reference/direction purposes and the works are publicly supported. Do not present another person’s work as your own to maintain a strategic distance from counterfeiting its results. Use it as a guide and not duplicate the work in exactly the same words (verbatim). eprojectguide.com is a vault of exploration works simply like academia.edu, researchgate.net, scribd.com, docsity.com, course hero, and numerous different stages where clients transfer works. The paid membership on eprojectguide.com is a method by which the site is kept up to help Open Education. In the event that you see your work posted here, and you need it to be eliminated/credited, it would be ideal if you call us on +2348064699975 or send us a mail along with the web address linked to the work, to eprojectguide@gmail.com. We will answer to and honor each solicitation. Kindly note notification it might take up to 24 – 48 hours to handle your solicitation.