The objectives of this study are to understand what drives professors’ motivation and what kind of rewarding supports especially their intrinsic motivation. From this point of view, the ultimate objective is to develop a proposal for a new, holistic reward system for tenured professors at Aalto University. In this study, motivational theories are used to approach rewarding because motivation is an important driver of professors’ performance and in most cases, it is affected by rewarding. The study was conducted as a part of a project that develops a new rewarding model as a proposal for the management of Aalto University. Because a new model is created as a result of this thesis, it is a constructive case study. The primary data used to support the model consists of a survey targeted to professors at Aalto University, two additional interviews with professors, and eight management interviews. In addition, internal material from the university, material from the project team’s meeting, and other discussions about the topic by professors were used as complementary data. The key findings of this study indicate that professors are indeed primarily intrinsically motivated but that their overall motivation is affected by external rewards as well. Moreover, if external rewards are poorly designed, a crowding-out effect occurs. Professors highly value academic freedom and trust and prefer forms of rewarding that enhance those elements in their work. They are also extremely inequity averse; therefore, if they perceive rewarding inequitable, their intrinsic motivation is affected negatively. Both the professors and the management were quite unanimous with the elements that the overall reward system should consist of. They preferred merit increase as the individual form of rewarding for long-term performance and additional resources to acknowledge the achievements of research groups or individual researchers. Finally, more pronounced and visible recognition of extraordinary accomplishments and success was called for. These elements together form a reward system that takes the long-term nature of professors’ work into account but on the other hand allows for recognizing single achievements within a short time. It supports their autonomy of work, advances their competence, and enhances their relatedness to the organization if communicated correctly.
Terms of Use: This is an academic paper. Students should NOT copy our materials word to word, as we DO NOT encourage Plagiarism. Only use as a guide in developing your original research work. Thanks.
Disclaimer: All undertaking works, records, and reports posted on this website, eprojectguide.com are the property/copyright of their individual proprietors. They are for research reference/direction purposes and the works are publicly supported. Do not present another person’s work as your own to maintain a strategic distance from counterfeiting its results. Use it as a guide and not duplicate the work in exactly the same words (verbatim). eprojectguide.com is a vault of exploration works simply like academia.edu, researchgate.net, scribd.com, docsity.com, course hero, and numerous different stages where clients transfer works. The paid membership on eprojectguide.com is a method by which the site is kept up to help Open Education. In the event that you see your work posted here, and you need it to be eliminated/credited, it would be ideal if you call us on +2348064699975 or send us a mail along with the web address linked to the work, to eprojectguide@gmail.com. We will answer to and honor each solicitation. Kindly note notification it might take up to 24 – 48 hours to handle your solicitation.