ABSTRACT
This study assessed the effect of partial and complete replacement of maize (ZeaMaysL.) with graded levels of melon shell and melon back (Cucumeropsis mannii) in the diet of clariasgariepinus. In a 60 days study in which 10 clarias gariepinus fingerlings stocked in each of 6 rectangular plastic tanks with dimension 10x12x20 filled with water to half its capacity and made in duplicates,were fed with feed which contains (20% maize, 10% melon shell, 20% melon shell) as one treatment and another treatment which contains (20% maize, 10% melon back, 20% melon back), the fish were fed to satiation twice daily, and the water parameters were monitored. The weight gains in the different treatments subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed no significant difference (P<0.05) among treatments. T-test showed no significant difference (P<0.05)between the melon shell and melon back treatments even though there were no significant difference (P<0.05) among treatments, it was observed that melon back meal (MBM) 20% had the highest weight gain (23.86g), the highest specific growth rate (0.91%), and the highest daily weight gain (1.2g). This was attributed to the fact that feed which contains 20% melon back floated longer, giving the fingerlings greater opportunity to feed on. The acceptance of melon back meal by clarias gariepinus is an indication that replacement of maize with melon back meal could be more profitable to fish farmers as maize is more expensive than melon back which is considered as waste. This study therefore suggest that melon back could be added to feed to enhance its floating ability.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE PAGE – – – – – – – – I
CERTIFICATION – – – – – – – – II
DEDICATION – – – – – – – – III
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT – – – – – – – IV
ABSTRACT – – – – – – – – – VI
TABLE OF CONTENT- – – – – – – – VII
LIST OF TABLES – – – – – – – – X
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION – – – – – 1
1.1 Background of the study – – – – – – 1
1.2 Justification of the study – – – – – – 6
1.3 General objectives – – – – – – – 6
1.4 Specific objectives – – – – – – – 7
CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW – – – – 8
2.1. Dietary Replacement Effects of Maize with Graded
Levels ofMelon Shell on Growth Performance of Clarias
gariepinus Fingerlings. – – – – – – 8
2.2 Growth performance at various stages of Clarias
Gariepinus (BURCHELL, 1822) fed various inclusion
levels of processed water melon (CITRULLUS LANATUS,
MANSF).Seedcake diets. – – – – – – 9
CHAPTER THREE: MATERIALS AND METHODS – – 12
3.1 Experimental site – – – – – – – 12
3.2 Sources and processing of ingredients – – – – 12
3.3 Formulation of experimental diet – – – – – 13
3.4 Experimental procedures – – – – – – 15
3.5 Experimental fish – – – – – – – 15
3.6 Feeding of experimental fish – – – – – 16
3.7 Physico-chemical parameters of experimental water- – – 16
3.8 Statistical data analysis – – – – – – 16
3.9 Calculation of Feed conversion ratio (FCR) – – – 17
3.9.1 Calculation of specificgrowth rate (SGR) – – – 17
3.9.2 Calculation of daily weight gain (DWG) – – – – 17
CHAPTER FOUR: RESULTS – – – – – – 18
4.1 Growth performance – – – – – – 18
4.2 Feed utilization – – – – – – – 20
4.3 Integrity test – – – – – – – – 21
4.4. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for comparing MM20%,
MSM 10% and MSM 20% – – – – – – 22
4.5 Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for comparing MM20%,
MBM 10% and MBM 20% – – – – – 22
4.6 T-test for comparing MSM and MBM – – – – 23
CHAPTER FIVE: SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION – – 24
5.1 Discussion – – – – – – – – 24
5.2 Summary – – – – – – – – 25
5.3 Conclusion – – – – – – – – 26
References
Terms of Use: This is an academic paper. Students should NOT copy our materials word to word, as we DO NOT encourage Plagiarism. Only use as a guide in developing your original research work. Thanks.
Disclaimer: All undertaking works, records, and reports posted on this website, eprojectguide.com are the property/copyright of their individual proprietors. They are for research reference/direction purposes and the works are publicly supported. Do not present another person’s work as your own to maintain a strategic distance from counterfeiting its results. Use it as a guide and not duplicate the work in exactly the same words (verbatim). eprojectguide.com is a vault of exploration works simply like academia.edu, researchgate.net, scribd.com, docsity.com, course hero, and numerous different stages where clients transfer works. The paid membership on eprojectguide.com is a method by which the site is kept up to help Open Education. In the event that you see your work posted here, and you need it to be eliminated/credited, it would be ideal if you call us on +2348064699975 or send us a mail along with the web address linked to the work, to eprojectguide@gmail.com. We will answer to and honor each solicitation. Kindly note notification it might take up to 24 – 48 hours to handle your solicitation.